Really disgusting photos

. Because there, Tom you go too loin…. Because there, Tom you go too loin…. Not but c’.est what these images. There the smart porn c’.était already limiting limit but c’.est worse than to border line. And then even: c’.est straightforwardly porn, not to admire this rubbish while clicking on this bond (parce qu’.il is out of question that j’.affiche CA about my blog. In any case j’.espère that for once, the sex will not be a salesman: enough of all that. Edict: Yes, that m’.arrive of “.péter plombs”. Tested for you: Kenzoki, in a mythique… place. 35 r?nses?#8220.Parce that there, Tom you go too loin….”. and yet I am not a prudish feminist, far from. Ms the c’.est deceived qd mm….…. I prefer 10000 times new publicity for Chanel with beautiful Kieira and this fabulous music (d’.ailleurs if you know the title of it and/or the singer I am taking. In short one zero pointed for Tom Ford on this blow. Completely d’.accord with you, as if the company already did not tpurnais enough around the sexe…. The advertizing that you put in illustration is really too suggestive, c’.est limit choquant…. Finally good, that would not make one not for l’.argent now. I am entièremment daccord with you there is an image in particular which m’.a vraimment shocked, and yet I am not frankly wedged. Good, in first, j’.éclate of laughing, because c’.est ridiculous, and then afterwards. One will never thank enough the writer as a chief VOGUE for d’.avoir launched the vagueness of the smart porn and his buddy Tom Ford. Still me …. I have just clicked on the bond, and j’.ai considering the photograph “.du low. There are a time of reflexion and of doubt …. And then after one laughs. - Cecile: And encore…. What j’.ai put in illustration of this ticket is an extract of pub: j’.ai of cutting original publicity so much c’.était shocking. - Alix: I am neither feminist nor bottom-bottom dresses it, but I find that this time c’.est gone too far. What I precisely do not include/understand, c’.est that pubs D&.G create a true din and that that, that passes in manner “.naturelle”.… completely. - Rosemary: Me that m’.a not even made laugh. I remained dubitative a long moment right to answer Rosemary: Pr me these photographs of Tom Ford are not to in no case porn chic…. Frankly, advertizing YSL that passed vrmt compared to that well it (at least that d’.YSL had one ounce of chic…. And beh lool, me j’.ai even not desire for looking at the photo…. Then t’.as cross Sharon Stone you too. C’.est quite simply really ugly. Like you, j’.espere that that will not be sold. Lagerfeld also always works in the same way (shades and lights, blacks and blancs….), Tom Ford has his, with an only one aim, to make speak about him. I find that this n’.est super not adapted to sell a perfume. Why not an erotic image (the advertising executives s’.amuser between two pub for yoghourts is necessary to leave) but there c’.est carrement ridiculous. (and still I n’.ai not clicked on the bond because I am at the office and that in my back there are two guys of maintenance who assemble a cupboard will j’.irai to see more closely but I must acknowledge that there like that, the photograph does not shock me more than ça…. - Emy: Go, one boycotts Tom Ford. - Eléo: Then does not click, the two guys of maintenance will take for an obsessed gross. - Miss E: Oh bah will see, me I find that really ugly and poor limit of s’.abaisser to communicate this way. There as a pine up you would owe t’.insurger in front of also little dellicatess to be honest... at these places... the perfume n’.est not really a luxury. In making advertizing to sell a perfume. I am not particularly shocked by this advertizing. If not, even if I do not leave too much any more of comments, I still visit your blog daily and I l’.adore always as much. Which bad goût…. Moreover, remade centres eurkkk. a little too hot this advertizing in my opinion. and like known as zabou: ugly, centres, moreover. I would not be against to show a naked woman for a male perfume, but qu’.au less one photographs it in the respect. Let us see the good side of the things: one will be able to locate the guys obsessed in function qu’.ils bought the perfume or not I find that degrading for the female condition. Ok c’.est salesman but good at this point the …. for perfume …. c’.est n’.importnawack. I do not find this image smart, hein. Just qu’.elle C’.est s’.inscrit in the movement says porn-knack, invented by FORD and his accomplice ROITFELD …. And I am d’.accord with MANU PRINCE, which says that c’.était makes so that l’.on speaks d’.eux, and qu’.ils succeeded well. Like what nowadays, one makes n’.importe what to sell, and worst the c’.est than it goes. We then do not n’.avons the same definition of this word …. - Melanie: Me I find that super degrading for us. And I wonder where this countryside will be affichée…. - Zabou: Too ugly Ouais, c’.est. - Angely: Even not hot, because that leaves marble the majority of the guys that j’.ai questioned on this subject. - Anaîs: Thank you for this extremely useful precision. - Marionfizz: Yes, as you say it “.ils have osé”. Bah us, one dares statement that c’.est ugly hold. - Eléonore: Here are t’.as very included/understood, me I do not find that of the whole esthétique…. - Rosemary: Thank you for these precise details, j’.avais me same understood that you liked. - Coralie: I do not know if it goes for this parfum…. one will see like D&G c’.est just hitsoire to make speak about him “.Porno chic”. (and not “.chic”. only). The “.chic”. refers to the marks of luxury which use this kind of concept to make advertizing. This n’.est not parce qu’.elle does not shock me, only I l’.aime for as much. The sex makes sell this n’.est very new. Ca shocks me, to tell the truth, the étravangences of the mode m’.ont never shocked. S’.il sells so much better for him, after all, c’.est its goal and I think that that will be sold. It extremely touches the significant point of much d’.homme. What qu’.on can say some, us girl and even the guys, was necessary to dare, it l’.a made and c’.est to attract the males, therefore a good blow. The advertizing n’.est not either porn. Perso I do not l’.afficherais in my room, but I would not spit above either. I do not see nevertheless in what the smart porn is more sizeable than the porn “.normal”. With final, c’.est always a disrespectful image of the woman. J’.imagine well this poster in full street, with an assembly of cars crashed to pieces below, parce qu’.elle will have disturbed everyone at the wheel. Well on I joke when to see this poster in full street, I find that of trés bad taste, whether it is that between the centres or l’.autre. That reduces to little thing the woman, and if that plait with the men, that will prove well the localization of their brain. In a word, reducer, as much for us that for them. As much that that you posted really does not shock me, as much the others are really feeling reluctant. I ask for myself jusqu’.où Tom Ford goes aller…. personally, this advertizing does not shock me, but absolutely desire d’.acheter this perfume does not give me. This end of body limits “.gluant”., this skin not clear. J’.en have to profit to go to view the news advertizing Chanel. I n’.ai ever bought perfume chanel…. but I would be almost tried. I believe qu’.il n’.y does not have either what to whip a cat. Especially when it is known that c’.est a homo which is with the orders of this advertizing and qu’.il n’.est not of the kind macho misogynist. And let us be honest, c’.est clearly that c’.est that which makes sell in the guys. A little second degree that devil. C’.est drole all these comments. J’.ai l’.impression to make a return behind d’. at least 25 years. That ḏ.hypocrisy, it is better in rire…. I discover tous.les.jours by chance with tele old-fashioned series much more shocking that that by their vulgarity and them médiocrité…. I does not include/understand what shocks some. This would be to show a gesture which points out some practise close friends. C’.est really a combat d’.arrière garde….J’.aime the freedom and the respect of really I l’.autre….Mais there do not see or am the lack of respect towards the “.femme”. E-mail (will not be affich?(requis) You can use these beacons HTML:. My Tribulations (of girl not gifted)